Iran Focus of New Sanctions, Last Step Before Military Action
Monday, January 11, 2010 at 8:28AM
The growing menace of an Iran poised to master the nuclear cycle - and build nuclear weapons for their missiles - is pushing the world community towards a new round of sanction.
And perhaps even an attack to destroy Iran's nuclear facilities if new sanctions fail.
But not everyone thinks that an aggressive posture against the Iranian regime would be the best course at this time.
The Iranian regime has lost much of its legitimacy as it brazenly stole national elections- and the home grown revolutionaries pouring into the streets chanting "Death to the Dictator", i.e., Grand Ayatollah Ali Hoseyni Khāmene’i, may provide an answer for how to deal with Iran.
The Globe and Mail analyses:
Shortly before Christmas, for the first time, the International Atomic Energy Agency recognized “the possibility of military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program.”
Iran, as a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, has to disclose any nuclear activities and allow inspections. In September, the world learned Iran was beginning to create an undisclosed enrichment facility in a tunnel beneath a mountain. That, plus Mr. Ahmadinejad's hostility and evasiveness, have made Iran's potential nuclear-weapons program a bigger worry than its authoritarianism.
But the nuclear issue is the one that can wait. The country currently has 8,000 centrifuges for making low-enriched uranium, of which only about 3,936 are being run, a number that has dropped by a thousand since last June: Iran is close to a making a weapon the way an owner of an iron mine is close to making an automobile. Their program is dropping away, probably because the protests have created other priorities.
Given this and other intelligence discoveries, the White House now believes it will be as long as three years before Iran is even capable of beginning the enrichment of its fuel into weapons-grade purity. Even then, under the most desirable of circumstances, even one weapon would take five or six additional years.
An attack on Iran would almost certainly accelerate the pace of the nuclear program, by allowing the regime to channel all its energies into militarization – exactly what the political crisis has prevented it from doing.
More importantly, an attack would end any anti-regime resistance.
Iran has come close to a major transformation several times: In the mid-1980s, and then at the beginning of the last decade. Those movements were only halted by outside forces: Saddam Hussein's attack and the war that followed; George W. Bush's “axis of evil,” which brought Mr. Ahmadinejad to power. To throw a bunker-buster bomb in the middle of democratic change now would be a historically wasted opportunity.
Reuters reports on the U.S.' calculations:


