THE 15% TAXATION ON INVESTORS HAS ONE PURPOSE AND PNE PURPOSE ONLY, "ENCOURAGE INVESTMENT" RATHER HAVE THE MONEY SITS IN BANK ACCOUNTS EARNING RIDICULOUSLY LOW INTERESTS.  BUT INVESTING ISN'T EASY, INVESTING YOUR MONEY REQUIRES BRAINS AND TO RAKE RISKS.  THE RISKS ONE TAKE WHEN INVESTING LARGE SUMS OF MONEY ARE ENORMOUS.

TO CHANGE THE TAX CODE IN ORDER TO TAX RISK TAKER INVESTOR A HIGHER RATE ITS A BAD IDEA ALL TOGETHER BECAUSE IT WILL DISCOURAGE INVESTORS THAT WILL THINK NOT TWICE BUT SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE INVESTING LARGE SUMS OF MONEY IN INDUSTRIES AND WHAT NOT.  THYE WILL THINK THT THEY ARE TAKING A HUGE RISK BUT ALSO THYE WILL BE TAXED SO HIGH THAT WHAT FOR TAKE RISKS?  A LOT LESS INVESTMENT WILL TAKE PLACE.

REMEMBER, IT IS THE PRIVATE SECTOR THAT INVESTS AND MOVES THE ECONOMY.  ROMNEY APPEARS TO PAY LITTLE TAXES BUT NOR REALLY, HE PAYS MILLIONS IN TAXES AND DONATE MILLIONS TO HIS CHURCH. 

ALSO, NOT ALL INVESTORS ARE AS SUCCESFUL AND AS RICH AS ROMNEY.  THE UNITD STATES SHOULD ENCOURAGE NOT DISCOURAGE INVESTORS. 

THE U. S. GOVERNMENT SHOULD ALSO CHILENIZE THE SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM BY PRIVATIZING IT, THUS MAKING EVERY CITIZEN AN INVESTOR IN HI HER OWN RETIREMENT.  THE REASON DEMOCRATS OPPOSE CHILENIZING THE SOCIAL SECURITY IS BECAUSE IT WILL REQUIRE THAT THE SOCIAL FUNDS THAT ACCUMULATE "CANNOT" BE TOUCHED (TAKEN) BY THE DEMOCRATS AND ANYBODY IN GOVERNMENT.

DEMOCRATS WERE AND ARE THE BIGGEST LOOTERS OF THE SOCIAL SECURITY FUNDS, AND AFTERWARDS THEY COMPLAINT THAT THERE ARE NOT ENOUGH FUNDS, NO WONDER.